New Business Model of ANI
Asian News International (ANI), a prominent Indian news agency, has recently adopted a new business model that involves issuing copyright claims against YouTubers who use its content. This new business model of ANI has significant implications for content creators and raises concerns about fair use and digital rights in India.
Background: Understanding the Shift (New Business Model of ANI)
Traditionally, news agencies like ANI have generated revenue through content syndication and partnerships. However, with the rise of digital platforms and user-generated content, they shifted their focus to the New Business Model of ANI. By actively monitoring YouTube for unauthorized use of its footage, ANI issues copyright strikes against channels that incorporate its content without permission.
Under YouTube’s policy, receiving three copyright strikes can lead to channel termination. This policy places significant pressure on content creators to resolve disputes quickly, often leading them to negotiate directly with ANI.
The Impact on YouTubers
Several Indian YouTubers have reported receiving multiple copyright strikes from ANI, accompanied by demands for substantial licensing fees to retract the claims. These fees reportedly range from ₹15 lakh to ₹25 lakh. For many independent creators, such amounts are financially burdensome and threaten their livelihoods.
One YouTuber, who wished to remain anonymous, shared that they had to pay a significant sum to ANI to lift the strikes and prevent their channel from being deleted. This situation underscores the power imbalance between large media organizations and individual content creators.
Insights from a Prominent Creator
In a recent video titled “Dear ANI,” Mohak Mangal, a well-known Indian YouTuber, addressed the issue, highlighting the challenges faced by content creators due to ANI’s actions. The creator emphasized the lack of clear guidelines on fair use in India and the disproportionate power held by large media organizations. They argued that such aggressive enforcement strategies could stifle creativity and hinder the growth of independent journalism.
Legal and Ethical Considerations
The Indian Copyright Act of 1957 includes provisions for “fair dealing,” allowing limited use of copyrighted material for purposes such as criticism, review, and reporting current events. However, the Act does not clearly define the boundaries of fair use, leading to ambiguity and potential exploitation.
Legal experts argue that while ANI is within its rights to protect its content, the new business model of ANI, which appears to rely heavily on aggressive copyright enforcement, may undermine the spirit of fair use and stifle independent journalism. The lack of clear guidelines leaves content creators vulnerable to legal challenges and financial strain.
YouTube’s Role and Response
YouTube has stated that it does not adjudicate copyright disputes but processes takedown notices in compliance with applicable laws. The platform provides a dispute mechanism for creators; however, the immediate removal of content upon receiving a claim can cause significant disruption.
Critics argue that YouTube’s policies may inadvertently favor large content owners over individual creators, as the threat of channel termination compels creators to settle disputes quickly, often at great personal cost. This dynamic has become more pronounced with the new business model of ANI, which appears to leverage copyright claims as a strategic tool, raising concerns about the balance of power and fairness on digital platforms.
Broader Implications
ANI’s approach reflects a broader trend where media organizations seek to monetize their content aggressively in the digital age. While protecting intellectual property is legitimate, the methods employed raise questions about access to information, freedom of expression, and the sustainability of independent content creation.
The situation calls for a reevaluation of copyright laws and platform policies to balance the rights of content owners with the need to foster a diverse and open digital media landscape.
Also read- Global Trade Wars 2025: India’s Rise up In Global Market
Authoritative Sources:
-
The Reporters’ Collective: ANI Finds Business Niche In Copyright Claims Against YouTubers
-
MediaNama: How ANI’s Copyright Claims Could Undermine Fair Dealing Exceptions For News Reporting
-
YouTube’s Official Blog: YouTube Responds to the Story
